Group wants to do away with DWI checkpoints Watch Video See Photos Read Comments
ADVERTISEMENT
Slideshow
Photo:

ABI argues for more targeted patrols, not checkpoints

By Matt Grant
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 at 10:25 p.m.

Read more: Local, Crime, Business, Community, Drunk Driving, Checkpoint, DWI, MADD

JEFFERSON CITY -- Beginning Wednesday, mid-Missouri law enforcement will be out of in force to watch for drunk drivers over the holiday weekend.

But what's the best way to catch drunk drivers? Not DWI checkpoints, according to the American Beverage Institute, which says sobriety stops are ineffective and a waste of money.

"There's no proof that [checkpoints] deter drunk drivers," said Sarah Longwell with the ABI. "When they talk about deterrent, I think of it more as a publicity stunt."

The ABI, a trade group that represents restaurants serving alcohol, also lobbies against lowering the legal drinking limit.

The group cites statistics from last year in California where a million people passed through checkpoints but only one-third of one percent were arrested for drunk driving.

Predictably, police agencies and Mothers Against Drunk Driving disagree, saying checkpoints save lives.

"If you even arrest one drunk at a checkpoint and you keep someone from being injured or killed," said Lt. John Hotz with the Highway Patrol. "How can you put a price tag on that?"

The Highway Patrol points to their own stats. In Camden County last summer one in 10 was arrested for drunk driving during an evening checkpoint.

"MADD's been present at a number of [checkpoints] since the mid-80s," said Bud Balky with MADD. "So we know they work, they're effective."

The ABI isn't entirely opposed to law enforcement crackdowns.

Longwell says police would be better served using "roving patrols," or saturations, where cops go out and look for drunk drivers instead of setting up checkpoints.

"You would expect that kind of targeted enforcement would result in more arrests than the idea of pulling these cops off the streets, have them stand in one spot," said Longwell, "in the hopes that a drunk driver's gonna wander through."

KRCG News checked and most mid-Missouri police agencies say they already do saturations in addition to checkpoints.

The Highway Patrol points to public opinion polls which they say indicate more than 80 percent of Missourians favor DWI checkpoints.

Related Links

SPONSORED CONTENT
6 Comments on this Story
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them; they are not reflective of the views or opinions of Barrington Broadcasting, KRCG, its directors or employees. If you believe a comment violates the Barrington Terms of Use, please report it here.

LOL!

Posted by Police Man, Jefferson City - Sunday, November 29, 2009 at 2:21 p.m.

"Imagine an unmarked black F150 stopped on an overpass, creating a traffic hazard by blocking a lane of traffic during rush hour."

Well, as an LEO in Jefferson City I can tell you neither JCPD or MSHP has ever owned an unmarked F150 that was used to run radar lol. So before you make up stories check your facts. DWI checkpoints aren't going anywhere and the only reason this group protests them is because they are feeling the pressure put on the drunks that pay their bills. I am all for saturation patrols, let's start outside the local establishments represented by this group lol.

We should have checkpoints more often

Posted by Julia V, Missouri - Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 6:38 p.m.

Agree with Aaron,

no problems here

Posted by sherry stegeman, california mo - Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 12:31 p.m.

Personally I have been through over 10 check points in all the years I have been driving and never have I had any issues. First off I dont drink and drive so no need to worry there. Second I watch traffic around me that maybe slowing or merging as a safety to begin with. And 3rd most of these checkpoints are done very late at night with very little traffic to worry about in the first place and are very well marked with lights. Keep up the great work if you take at least one drunk off the road whom might do harm to another by being careless I say keep doing it!!!

I wounder

Posted by Aaron Hazelton, Holts SUmmit - Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 12:14 p.m.

1. Do you think they would protest a check point if someone in the family was killed by a drunk driver?

2. My car has legal plates, insurance... i don't drink and drive or do drugs .... so makes no difference to me... load them up and put a check point on every corner...

3. But what about my constitutional rights blah blah blah ... If it saves a life and gets a drunk off the street I guess I can wait the 30 seconds it takes for a check point...

4. "group that represents restaurants serving alcohol , lobbies against lowering the legal drinking limit" ... Yes I can see how they care about the drunks on the roads... sounds more like $$$$$$$ over safety to me.

MSHP you got my vote on check points !!!!!!!

My Opinion

Posted by J F, jc mo - Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 12:13 p.m.

The people who want to stop checkpoints obviously have not lost a loved one in an accident that involved alcohol. I have. I say keep the checkpoints!!

A public danger

Posted by Matthew Taylor, Mid-Missouri - Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 12:01 a.m.

I have personally observed more than one "holiday" traffic enforcement action that created a public hazard based on the actions of the LEOs at the scene. Imagine an unmarked black F150 stopped on an overpass, creating a traffic hazard by blocking a lane of traffic during rush hour, with an "officer" in the back shooting radar at traffic on the highway beneath them. I was almost involved in two vehicle collisions as traffic attempting to cross the overpass had to merge into one lane, without any advanced warning. Then, after I turned onto the highway on-ramp, I encountered a mass of vehicles that could not decide what to do because of the numerous patrol cars pulling traffic over on BOTH sides of the highway. How are people supposed to "move over or slow down" when they are attempting to merge onto a highway and are faced with LEOs on both sides of the road? This situation unfolded a couple of years ago in Jefferson City, at the highway 54 Ellis Boulevard/Southwest Boulevard intersection. If I would have been involved in a wreck I would have brought a lawsuit against the MSHP and Jefferson City.

News
ADVERTISEMENT

PopularCommented


CONSUMER INFO